When the knee switches the muscle off – Knowledge

1. Why this text?

There is a situation that comes up almost weekly in physiotherapy and leaves people baffled. The operation went well. The knee looks tidy, the X-ray is fine, the range of motion is coming back. And yet: when you are asked to lift your straight leg off the couch, nothing happens. The heel stays put. You strain, you feel yourself straining – and the thigh stays soft.

People experience the same thing after an ACL rupture, after a knee arthroscopy, with a badly irritated osteoarthritic knee, and in the first weeks after a knee replacement. And nearly all of them draw the same conclusion: I am making a fuss. I have not trained enough. I have too little pain tolerance.

That is wrong, and it is well documented that it is wrong. What is happening has a name: arthrogenic muscle inhibition. The joint itself throttles the nerve signal to the muscle. The muscle is present, it is healthy, it could work – but the signal that would activate it arrives dampened. Willpower changes little about this, because the throttling sits upstream of the will [2], [3].

This is more than a definition. It changes the order of treatment. Fighting an inhibition with ever heavier weights means working against a handbrake that is on. Releasing the brake first – reducing swelling, restoring activation – and only then building strength gets you further. That is precisely the argument of the review article that prompted this text: inhibition should be a treatment target in its own right, not something dealt with in passing [1].

This text explains what the inhibition is, why the joint reacts this way, how common it is and how long it lasts, how to recognise it – and what helps, in what order. It also says where the evidence is thin; with this topic that is more than a courtesy. Every statement is referenced; the numbers in square brackets point to the reference list at the end.

One note in advance: this article does not replace individual advice. What makes sense for you, after your injury, your operation and with your other conditions, is what your own treatment will tell you – and that takes precedence over everything described here.

2. What arthrogenic muscle inhibition is

2.1 The name, taken literally

"Arthrogenic" is built from arthron (Greek for joint) and -genic (arising from). Arthrogenic muscle inhibition therefore means nothing other than: muscle inhibition arising from the joint. It was first described under this name in 2000, in a review that gathered the scattered observations together [2].

What is meant is a reflex inhibition: an injured, inflamed, swollen or freshly operated joint sends altered messages to the nervous system, which in turn reduces the drive to the muscles around that joint. At the knee it is almost always the same muscle that is hit hardest – the knee extensor (technical term: quadriceps), and within it especially the inner portion just above the kneecap.

Two distinctions are what make the term useful. Both deserve a section of their own.

2.2 Inhibition is not wasting

A muscle can be weak for two entirely different reasons. Either there is less muscle – that is wasting (technical term: atrophy), and only training over weeks and months helps. Or there is just as much muscle, but part of it is not being called upon – that is inhibition, and it can resolve within days.

How differently the two contribute was shown by an often-cited study of twenty people, measured before and about four weeks after a knee replacement. The result [10]:

Together, the lower two rows explained 85 % of the strength loss – and the failure of activation contributed almost twice as much as the wasting [10]. A loss of two thirds of the strength in a muscle that has become a tenth thinner: that is only possible if a large part of the existing muscle is standing still.

The one sentence to take away: the muscle is still there. It is simply no longer being called. That is not a euphemism but a measurement – and it is the reason why the first weeks have to look different from ordinary strength training.

2.3 And it is not simply pain either

The obvious explanation would be: the muscle does not contract because it hurts. That is partly true – pain does inhibit, and severe pain immediately after an operation is among the risk factors for pronounced inhibition [17]. But pain does not explain the phenomenon on its own.

The cleanest evidence comes from experiments on healthy volunteers. Fluid can be introduced into a healthy knee until a certain internal pressure is reached. This does not hurt appreciably – and yet the measurable strength of the knee extensor drops immediately, along with the electrical activity in the muscle [8]. So no pain is needed for the inhibition to set in; a distended joint is enough.

The reverse holds too: when pain is well controlled after an operation, activation is not automatically back. Freedom from pain is a precondition for good training, but it is no guarantee that the muscle can be reached again.

3. Why the joint throttles the muscle

The inhibition does not arise in a single place. The reviews distinguish three levels – in the joint itself, in the spinal cord and in the brain [1], [3], [5], [6]. For the third level, however, the evidence is considerably weaker than is often read; see section 3.3.

3.1 The fluid inside the joint

The knee is a closed capsule. Sensors in its wall respond to stretch and pressure. When fluid accumulates – after an injury, during inflammation, after an operation – the internal pressure rises, the capsule is stretched, and these sensors fire continuously.

This is the level with the best evidence, because it can be reproduced experimentally. In the study already mentioned, fluid was introduced into the knees of sixteen healthy people until the internal pressure reached 50 mmHg. Afterwards, the strength of the knee extensor and the conduction velocity in the muscle fibres had dropped markedly [8]. Another study showed that movement changes under the same condition: landing from a single-leg drop, the knee absorbed less [7] – so the inhibition does not stay in the laboratory, it shows up in movement.

This fits what is measured after operations. In people after a knee replacement, the loss of extension strength was directly related to the extent of the swelling [14]. And after a fresh ACL rupture, a joint effusion was one of the strongest pointers to the presence of inhibition [16].

Why this matters in practice: swelling is therefore not merely a sign that the joint is irritated. It is a cause of the weakness – and the only cause you can do something about yourself, immediately.

3.2 The switching in the spinal cord

Messages from the joint travel to the spinal cord, and that is where the switching happens. Three processes have been described – deliberately kept brief, because they change little for treatment [3], [5]:

• The feedback loop is dampened. Normally, sensors within the muscle report its stretch and thereby amplify the contraction. This amplification is turned down before it reaches the muscle nerve.
• The sensitivity of the muscle spindles falls. The muscle then reports less of what is happening inside it – and receives correspondingly less drive back.
• The flexion reflex is given priority. In this state the nervous system favours bending the knee over straightening it. That is why it is typically full extension that fails.

The last point explains an observation many people make: bending works, contracting with the knee bent works – but the last few degrees to a fully straight position are missing, and it is exactly there that the muscle feels "empty".

3.3 And the brain?

Here it gets interesting, and here this text departs from what is often read – including from the blog post that prompted it. The common account runs: after a knee injury the excitability of the control centre in the brain falls, and therefore less drive reaches the muscle [1].

This was measured using magnetic stimulation of the brain in seventeen healthy volunteers, again with an artificially produced joint effusion. The result was the opposite of the expectation: the excitability of the control centre rose after the effusion, both at rest and during contraction. The authors state explicitly that their data provide no evidence for a contribution of the brain to the inhibition [9]. Similar, partly contradictory findings exist in people with long-standing knee problems.

One plausible reading: the brain increases its drive because something further down is braking – the way you press the accelerator harder when the handbrake is slightly on. Whether that is correct is open. The summaries of recent years therefore record that the role of the brain in arthrogenic muscle inhibition is unresolved [4], [5].

Why this is here: because treatment offers are derived from it – imagery training, screen-based exercises, procedures that "reprogramme the brain". As long as the level itself is not established, these are hypotheses. They may be right. They are not proven.

3.4 What the inhibition is actually good for

It is worth not seeing the inhibition purely as a malfunction. A joint that has just been injured or operated on does not tolerate full force. A muscle pulling at full strength on an unstable or freshly sutured joint can do damage. On this reading the inhibition is a protective reflex: useful in the short term, instantly available, requiring nothing from you.

The problem is not that it occurs. The problem is that it stays once the reason is long gone. In that it resembles other protective reactions of the body, such as guarded posture in back pain: helpful in the first week, obstructive in the third month.

4. How common – and how long?

Numbers come mainly from ACL research, because that is where systematic study has been done. A French group examined 300 people with a fresh ACL rupture at their first appointment. In 56.7 % there was inhibition. And – this is the reassuring half – in 79 % of those it resolved during that same consultation, once simple exercises had been taught. Only a small proportion needed a programme of their own [16].

The same group followed 210 people after ACL surgery. Three weeks afterwards, 48.6 % had inhibition; at six weeks, 24.3 % still did [17]. The risk factors are notable: those already inhibited before surgery had roughly an eightfold higher risk afterwards; severe pain immediately after the procedure tripled to quadrupled it; and those who had had no physiotherapy before surgery were also more often affected.

For the knee with osteoarthritis the picture differs, but points the same way. In 123 people with advanced knee osteoarthritis, activation explained 40 % of the differences in strength in the affected leg – in the healthy leg of the same people only 17 %. There, muscle mass was the better explanation [12]. Put differently: in a healthy leg, what mainly matters is how much muscle is there. In an osteoarthritic knee, what mainly matters is how much of it is reached.

And after a knee replacement? There the inhibition shifts over the months, but the consequences remain visible for longer. A cohort study measured 24 people before and up to six months after surgery and compared them with healthy people of the same age. After one month all values had collapsed; after six months the patients were back at their pre-operative level – and were exactly as far behind the healthy group as they had been before [13].

To sum this up: the inhibition is common, it is quickly reversible in many people, and it is more stubborn the longer the joint has been irritated beforehand. The timetable reads: activation in days to weeks, strength in months.

5. How you notice it

There is no single test that proves inhibition. But there is a set of observations that together give a clear picture:

• The kneecap does not travel. When you contract the thigh, the kneecap should visibly slide one to two centimetres upwards. If it stays put, too little is reaching the muscle.
• The bulge above the kneecap is missing. On contraction, the inner portion of the extensor normally forms a palpable bulge just above the inner edge of the kneecap. Compared side by side, its absence is immediately obvious.
• The straight leg cannot be lifted. You lie down, the knee is straight, you are asked to lift the heel – and the knee sags a few degrees at the moment of lifting. Clinicians call this an extension lag.
• The last few degrees are missing. Passively – when someone else moves the leg – the knee goes fully straight. Actively, under your own power, the last five to fifteen degrees are missing.
• The knee "gives way". Going down stairs or standing up it buckles briefly, without your seeing it coming.
• You walk with a stiff knee. Many people unconsciously hold the knee straight when walking, because that unloads the extensor. This is not a habit but an adaptation to the missing strength.

Two things argue against pure inhibition and should be assessed: weakness that is new and increasing although swelling and pain are subsiding – and weakness together with numbness or tingling in a particular area of the leg. A nerve may then be involved, and that is a different matter.

6. How it is measured

6.1 In the laboratory: the proportion that is called upon

The precise method is called the central activation ratio, or CAR. You contract as hard as you can, and at the moment of greatest effort an electrical stimulus is delivered to the muscle on top of that. If the measured force rises further, part of the muscle was dormant: the stimulus brings out what your own drive did not reach.

A value of 100 % means everything was called upon. It is exactly this method that produced the numbers in section 2.2 and section 4 [10], [12]. It is reliable – but it needs equipment that a normal practice does not have.

6.2 In practice: look, feel, compare

Everyday practice therefore proceeds differently. The French group mentioned above proposed a grading based on the inner portion of the extensor and on extension [15]:

The practical value of this grading lies less in the number than in the question behind it: does the inhibition resolve when it is addressed directly – yes or no? That question can be answered in a single session, and it determines what happens next.

6.3 What this grading lacks

The grading comes from a case series and has so far not been validated against a measurement method – nobody has checked whether "grade 1a" really corresponds to a particular range of activation. A group of 27 researchers in the field said so explicitly in a 2024 letter to the editor, calling for more validation and objective measurement [18]. The examiners in the original study agreed with each other very closely [16] – but that only shows they saw the same thing, not that they measured the right thing.

For you as a patient this changes little: whether the number is right is secondary. Whether your muscle fires today, you can see for yourself.

7. Step 1: the swelling

If fluid in the joint helps trigger the inhibition (section 3.1), then treating it is not comfort but the first lever. What is unusual about it: this is the only measure you can carry out yourself, without equipment and without an appointment.

Cold. In the experiment with the artificial joint effusion, one half of the participants then had ice on the knee for twenty minutes, the other half nothing. In the cold group, strength and conduction velocity in the muscle rose significantly afterwards [8]. That is a small experiment in healthy people – but it is one of the few direct demonstrations that a measure reduces the inhibition itself. A review of ACL rehabilitation accordingly rated the evidence for cold as moderate, placing it alongside targeted exercise – the only two approaches with that rating [19].

Compression and elevation. After knee replacement, a combined programme of adjustable compression, lymphatic drainage and home exercises was tested. Swelling fell markedly, and it did not return in the three weeks after the programme stopped [20]. For context: this was a feasibility study with sixteen people, not a randomised trial – good enough to do it, not good enough to promise it.

In practice that means: in the first weeks, cool several times a day (15–20 minutes, never directly on the skin), raise the leg above heart level at every opportunity, and dose activity so that the knee is not thicker in the evening than in the morning. The circumference of the knee, measured each day at the same place, is a usable compass for this.

8. Step 2: activation

8.1 Contract deliberately – and watch while you do

This sounds banal and is not. An inhibition is released not with load but with attention and feedback. What has proven useful:

• Look. While contracting, look at the thigh, not at the ceiling. You need the feedback about whether anything is moving.
• Feel. Put one hand on the inner portion above the kneecap. What you feel under your hand is more honest than the sensation in the leg.
• Short and often. Contract for five seconds, release for five, ten times – and repeat several times across the day. Activation is practice, not exhaustion.
• Roll the heel in. Placing a small roll under the heel and pressing the knee down reaches the extensor in exactly the position where it is most likely to drop out.
• The healthy leg first. Contract once on the healthy side, feel what it is like, then look for the same thing on the affected side.

When a device makes the muscle activity visible or audible (technical term: biofeedback), that is the technical version of the same idea. It does not replace your own attention; it sharpens it.

8.2 Electrical stimulation

The most direct way around an inhibition: if your own drive does not reach the muscle, the muscle is made to contract electrically from outside (technical term: NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation). This is not a pleasant tingling treatment – it is a strong, visible contraction.

The reference trial: 66 people received, from 48 hours after a knee replacement and in addition to standard rehabilitation, 15 contractions twice daily at the maximum tolerable intensity, over six weeks. After three and a half weeks this group was significantly better on strength, functional tests and active extension. After one year the differences were smaller, but still detectable for strength and function [21].

An important detail from the same group: intensity decides. How strongly someone had set the stimulation explained 68 % of the differences in strength gain at three and a half weeks [22]. A comfortable setting achieves little; it should be unpleasant but bearable.

The pooled analysis of nine randomised trials with 691 people confirms the direction: electrical stimulation clearly improved strength in the first month, decreasing thereafter but still measurable beyond a year. The authors note, however, that many of these improvements did not reach the threshold of a noticeable change [23]. So it is a well-documented aid of limited size – not the treatment itself.

8.3 What else is being tried

A number of further offers cluster around activation. Two you may encounter:

• Electrical stimulation for pain relief (technical term: TENS). The idea: with fewer disruptive messages reaching the spinal cord, less braking occurs. The review of ACL rehabilitation rates the evidence for this as weaker than for cold and exercise [19].
• Procedures that rely on "reprogramming" – imagery training combined with sounds or tactile cues. The best-known study examined 30 people, without a comparison group, and found 45 % higher muscle activity and a clearly smaller extension deficit after a single session [24]. That is striking – but a case series without a control group cannot separate expectation, attention and natural course from effect. Compounding this: the study was written by people with a financial connection to the method; that is stated openly in the publication.

8.4 What is not proven

For the sake of honesty, since the topic is currently in fashion:

• No study shows that a targeted "AMI treatment" improves the one-year outcome. What is documented is that individual measures improve activation in the short term. That this turns into lasting better function is plausible, but untested.
• The role of the brain is unresolved (section 3.3). Everything justified by it rests on unsecured ground.
• Manual techniques, tapes, supplements, vibration devices – for none of these is there usable evidence with respect to the inhibition.

That does not mean nothing helps. It means the documented tools are simple: reduce swelling, activate deliberately, help electrically, then train.

9. Step 3: strength

9.1 Why heavy loads too early achieve little

This is the practically most important consequence of the whole topic – and it has been tested. A trial in 162 people compared two rehabilitation programmes after knee replacement: a high-intensity one with progressive resistance training from day four, and a low-intensity one. Both over eleven weeks, 26 sessions.

Result: no difference at 3 or at 12 months – not in stair climbing, not in walking, not in symptoms, not in strength and not in measured activation. Both groups improved markedly, and the high-intensity programme was safe. The authors attribute the absence of an advantage explicitly to arthrogenic muscle inhibition in the early phase [25].

Important, so this does not land wrongly: this is not an argument against strength training. Both groups got better, and strength remains the goal. It is an argument against the assumption that more load earlier automatically means more progress. As long as the muscle is only partly reachable, what you mainly train is the part that is already working.

9.2 Training with restricted blood flow

This creates a dilemma: strength gains normally require heavy loads, but a fresh knee does not tolerate heavy loads. One way out is training with restricted blood flow (technical term: blood flow restriction, BFR): a wide cuff on the thigh limits venous return, so that loads of just 20 to 30 % of maximum act like considerably heavier training.

The evidence is mixed. A review of applications in musculoskeletal rehabilitation found overall advantages compared with training at the same light loads without a cuff [26]. For use around knee replacement, the best single trial is more sobering: 86 people trained for eight weeks before surgery, either with a cuff or not at all. At three months the training group had more strength – but no advantage in standing up from a chair, in walking, in range of motion or in symptoms. By twelve months the strength advantage had disappeared as well [28]. A review of its use in knee replacement describes the evidence base as small and inconsistent [29].

On safety: applied correctly the method is well tolerated; international recommendations set out how the pressure is determined and when it should be avoided [27]. It belongs in professional hands – not on a cuff ordered off the internet.

The fair verdict: a sensible option when heavy loads are impossible or intolerable. No substitute for strength training once that is possible – and no reason to force it.

9.3 When ordinary strength training takes over

As soon as activation is back – the kneecap travels, the straight leg can be held, the last degrees are achieved actively – the usual rules of strength training apply: two to three sessions a week, sets taken close to fatigue, load or repetitions increased regularly, and all of that over months. What happens inside the muscle, and why patience is part of it, is described in our article on building muscle. That supervised exercise therapy after a knee replacement is worthwhile is documented: in a summary of 18 trials with 1,739 people, function and pain were better at three to four months than with minimal therapy, and in the methodologically stronger studies the advantage lasted to six months [31]. What counts in the long run is therefore not the number of therapy sessions but whether training continues afterwards.

The transition is rarely a date; it is a shift of weight within the programme: in week two it is 80 % activation and 20 % strength, in month three the other way round.

10. More than strength: walking, balance, confidence

Knee extensor strength is the single value that best predicts how well someone climbs stairs, stands up and walks after a knee replacement [11]. Even so, strength alone does not restore function. Anyone who has walked with a stiff knee for months has learned a movement pattern that persists even when the muscle could long since do otherwise. The later phase therefore includes:

• Walking with feedback – attending to the roll-through, deliberately allowing the knee to bend slightly on contact, occasionally checking in a mirror or on video.
• Balance and perturbation – single-leg stance, soft surfaces, small pushes. This trains the fast, involuntary contraction that no strength machine reaches.
• Dual tasks – walking while doing arithmetic or holding a conversation. Only then does it show whether the movement has really become automatic.
• Stairs down and braking – the most demanding requirement on the extensor and usually the last thing to come back.

The link to falls risk is direct: a leg that buckles going down stairs is a falls risk, regardless of what the strength measurement says. See our article on fall prevention.

11. Before the operation

Probably the most practical finding on this topic: those already inhibited before ACL surgery had an approximately eightfold higher risk of still being inhibited three weeks afterwards. And those who had had no physiotherapy at all before surgery were also considerably more often affected [17]. The authors of the grading go so far as to suggest postponing the procedure in pronounced cases in favour of targeted preparation [15].

For knee replacement the evidence on preparation is more mixed – one summary found small, short-lived advantages in pain and function, mainly in the first weeks after surgery [32]. That is less than is often promised, but it is not nothing, and the measures themselves carry little risk.

What is worth doing when an operation is coming up: settle the swelling as far as possible beforehand, work on full extension, practise deliberate contraction (so that it does not have to be relearned after surgery) – and know what to do in the first few days. More on this in our article on knee replacement.

12. And without surgery? The osteoarthritic knee

Inhibition is not a purely surgical topic. A knee with advanced osteoarthritis is repeatedly irritated and swollen, and activation is correspondingly often restricted – in the 123 people studied it was the most important explanation for weakness in the affected leg [12]. The authors draw a notable conclusion from this: restricted activation could undermine the success of ordinary strengthening programmes.

One should not, however, take the wrong lesson from it. Exercise works in knee osteoarthritis – and that is well documented. The Cochrane review of 54 studies found pain relief equivalent to about 12 points on a 0-to-100 scale, and an improvement in function of about 10 points [30]. For a measure without side effects, that is a good result.

Inhibition rather explains why some people with osteoarthritis gain hardly any strength despite diligent training – and what can additionally be done in that case: settle the joint's irritation, choose loads such that the knee does not swell afterwards, and practise activation explicitly instead of taking it for granted.

13. Seven misunderstandings

14. When to get in touch

These observations are worth an appointment – not urgently, but soon:

• The knee becomes thicker again after the swelling had already gone down.
• Active extension gets worse over weeks instead of better.
• The knee buckles when walking or going down stairs.
• You practise regularly and see no change over four to six weeks in the contraction.
• The weakness comes with numbness, tingling or a dropping foot – then the question is whether a nerve is involved.

A knee that swells rapidly and severely, is hot and red, especially together with fever or feeling generally unwell – and particularly after an operation – needs immediate medical assessment. This is rare, but it no longer has anything to do with muscle inhibition.

15. In summary

• Arthrogenic muscle inhibition means: the joint throttles the nerve signal to the muscle. The muscle is there, it is simply not being called [2], [3].
• It explains the larger part of the early strength loss after a knee replacement [10] and much of the weakness in an osteoarthritic knee [12].
• It is common and usually reversible: after a fresh ACL rupture, in more than half, of whom four fifths resolved at once [16].
• Swelling is the first lever – it inhibits measurably, even without pain [8], [14].
• Then comes activation: deliberate contraction with feedback, and in the first weeks electrical stimulation at high intensity [21], [22].
• Only then strength. Training very heavily early brings no advantage while the brake is on [25].
• What is not established: the role of the brain [9], the validity of the clinical grading [18] and the benefit of "reprogramming" procedures [24].
• Timeframe: activation in days to weeks, strength in months – and after six months the work is not yet finished [13].

And the sentence this is really about: if your leg will not, although you will, that is not a verdict on you. It is a finding – and findings can be treated.

References

[1] Kakavas G, Sasse C, Królikowska A, Wong S, Becker R, Prill R. Rehabilitation of Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis and after Knee Arthroplasty. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2026;19(1):44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-026-10038-7

[2] Hopkins JT, Ingersoll CD. Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition: A Limiting Factor in Joint Rehabilitation. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2000;9(2):135–159. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.9.2.135

[3] Rice DA, McNair PJ. Quadriceps Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition: Neural Mechanisms and Treatment Perspectives. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2010;40(3):250–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2009.10.001

[4] Norte G, Rush J, Sherman D. Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition: Best Evidence, Mechanisms, and Theory for Treating the Unseen in Clinical Rehabilitation. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2022;31(6):717–735. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2021-0139

[5] Lepley AS, Lepley LK. Mechanisms of Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2022;31(6):707–716. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2020-0479

[6] Pietrosimone B, Lepley AS, Kuenze C, et al. Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2022;31(6):694–706. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2021-0128

[7] Palmieri-Smith RM, Kreinbrink J, Ashton-Miller JA, Wojtys EM. Quadriceps Inhibition Induced by an Experimental Knee Joint Effusion Affects Knee Joint Mechanics during a Single-Legged Drop Landing. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2007;35(8):1269–1275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506296417

[8] Rice D, McNair PJ, Dalbeth N. Effects of cryotherapy on arthrogenic muscle inhibition using an experimental model of knee swelling. Arthritis & Rheumatism (Arthritis Care & Research). 2009;61(1):78–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24168

[9] Rice DA, McNair PJ, Lewis GN, Dalbeth N. Quadriceps arthrogenic muscle inhibition: the effects of experimental knee joint effusion on motor cortex excitability. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2014;16(6):502. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-014-0502-4

[10] Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Stevens JE, Vandenborne K, Snyder-Mackler L. Early Quadriceps Strength Loss After Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Contributions of Muscle Atrophy and Failure of Voluntary Muscle Activation. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2005;87(5):1047–1053. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.01992

[11] Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Snyder-Mackler L. Quadriceps Strength and the Time Course of Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2005;35(7):424–436. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2005.35.7.424

[12] Petterson SC, Barrance P, Buchanan T, Binder-Macleod S, Snyder-Mackler L. Mechanisms Underlying Quadriceps Weakness in Knee Osteoarthritis. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2008;40(3):422–427. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31815ef285

[13] Bade MJ, Kohrt WM, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Outcomes Before and After Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Healthy Adults. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2010;40(9):559–567. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2010.3317

[14] Holm B, Kristensen MT, Bencke J, Husted H, Kehlet H, Bandholm T. Loss of Knee-Extension Strength Is Related to Knee Swelling After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2010;91(11):1770–1776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.229

[15] Sonnery-Cottet B, Hopper GP, Gousopoulos L, et al. Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition Following Knee Injury or Surgery: Pathophysiology, Classification, and Treatment. Video Journal of Sports Medicine. 2022;2(3):26350254221086295. https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254221086295

[16] Sonnery-Cottet B, Hopper GP, Gousopoulos L, et al. Incidence of and Risk Factors for Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition in Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Cross-Sectional Study and Analysis of Associated Factors From the SANTI Study Group. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2024;52(1):60–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465231209987

[17] Sonnery-Cottet B, Barrera Uso M, Coquard M, et al. Incidence and Risk Factors for Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition in the Early Postoperative Period After ACL Reconstruction. A Cohort Study From the SANTI Study Group. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2026;14(1):23259671251350305. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251350305

[18] Norte GE, Sherman DA, Rush JL, et al. Advancing Clinical Evaluation and Treatment of Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition: A Need for Validation and Innovation – Letter to the Editor. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2024;52(12):NP34–NP36. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241272410

[19] Sonnery-Cottet B, Saithna A, Quelard B, et al. Arthrogenic muscle inhibition after ACL reconstruction: a scoping review of the efficacy of interventions. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019;53(5):289–298. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098401

[20] Carmichael J, Dennis D, Jennings J, Stevens-Lapsley J, Bade M. Feasibility and initial efficacy of a multimodal swelling intervention after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective pilot study with historical controls. The Knee. 2022;35:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2022.01.008

[21] Stevens-Lapsley JE, Balter JE, Wolfe P, Eckhoff DG, Kohrt WM. Early Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to Improve Quadriceps Muscle Strength After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Physical Therapy. 2012;92(2):210–226. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20110124

[22] Stevens-Lapsley JE, Balter JE, Wolfe P, Eckhoff DG, Schwartz RS, Schenkman M, Kohrt WM. Relationship Between Intensity of Quadriceps Muscle Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Strength Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Physical Therapy. 2012;92(9):1187–1196. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20110479

[23] Peng L, Wang K, Zeng Y, Wu Y, Si H, Shen B. Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Frontiers in Medicine. 2021;8:779019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.779019

[24] Dos Anjos T, Gabriel F, Vieira TD, Hopper GP, Sonnery-Cottet B. Neuromotor Treatment of Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition After Knee Injury or Surgery. Sports Health. 2024;16(3):383–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231169285

[25] Bade MJ, Struessel T, Dayton M, et al. Early High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis Care & Research. 2017;69(9):1360–1368. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23139

[26] Hughes L, Paton B, Rosenblatt B, Gissane C, Patterson SD. Blood flow restriction training in clinical musculoskeletal rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017;51(13):1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-097071

[27] Patterson SD, Hughes L, Warmington S, et al. Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety. Frontiers in Physiology. 2019;10:533. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00533

[28] Jørgensen SL, Aagaard P, Bohn MB, et al. The Effect of Blood Flow Restriction Exercise Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty on Postoperative Physical Function, Lower Limb Strength and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2024;34(11):e14750. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14750

[29] Viscay-Sanhueza N, Curilem Gatica C, Bahamondes-Avila C. Exercise with blood flow restriction among adults undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A scoping review. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2025;42:665–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.01.020

[30] Fransen M, McConnell S, Harmer AR, Van der Esch M, Simic M, Bennell KL. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015;(1):CD004376. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004376.pub3

[31] Artz N, Elvers KT, Lowe CM, Sackley C, Jepson P, Beswick AD. Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise following total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2015;16:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0469-6

[32] Moyer R, Ikert K, Long K, Marsh J. The Value of Preoperative Exercise and Education for Patients Undergoing Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JBJS Reviews. 2017;5(12):e2. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00015